4BV

Four pillars. One practice.

the work

The four pillars

Who the work is for.

Four constituencies in pediatric care, each with a different stake and a different way of being failed.

Stake

Parents

Most pediatric decisions get made at home, at night, by someone who is not a clinician and has no one to ask. That is where the worry actually lives, and it is the least served part of the system.

Fails as: an assistant that answers confidently and sends a sick child back to bed.

Load

Clinicians

The people carrying the work. Tooling should give time back to the encounter rather than extract more throughput from the person doing it.

Fails as: efficiency gains that quietly become the new expected baseline.

Succession

Learners

The people who will practice after us. Using these tools well is becoming part of clinical competence, and very little of it is being taught deliberately.

Fails as: teaching the tool instead of the judgment.

Honesty

Research

The pillar that keeps the other three accountable. If we cannot measure whether something helps, we are guessing with other people's children.

Fails as: reporting the number that flatters the product.

Research

Evidence before opinion.

Independent benchmarks and evaluation methodology.

Preprint incoming

A pediatric AI benchmark

The first evaluation suite built specifically for pediatric clinical AI — because adult benchmarks don't catch the failures that hurt kids. Methodology paper preprint incoming.

Get notified →
Private / WIP

Clinical decision support evaluation

Head-to-head evaluation against the major third-party CDS tools, paired with original prompt design — our pediatric-tuned prompts perform on par with the commercial leaders. Internal benchmarks, structured grading, local-first stack.

Read the methodology →

Still building

A year of shipping.

Public and private commits across every project on this page.

Less More